One workflow, built inside the systems you already run on, for a fixed price agreed up front.
"AI that fits into the tools you already use, instead of being one more thing to deal with."
The rule I build to
The same details typed into three places.
→Typed once. It lands in the rest.
An hour rebuilding a document you've written fifty times.
→Drafted from your own precedent, in your format.
Intake sitting in someone's notebook.
→In the matter, in the right fields.
Four tabs open to answer one question.
→One view, already updated.
Documents built from the precedent library the firm already has, in the firm's format and language.
Numbers that lived in four tabs, in one place that updates itself.
If it happens on a screen, more than once a week, the same way each time, it can probably be built. Bring it to the call.
Fixed price, quoted before anything starts. No hourly invoices.
One workflow, picked together on the call. The one that takes the most time or causes the most rework.
The rest of the workflows, once the pilot has been tried on your own files.
Fixes and changes as your process changes.
You describe the work that keeps getting typed. I tell you what's worth building and what isn't.
The workflow, the price, the date, and a written list of every tool that would touch your files. I need an hour with whoever does the work now.
A working prototype on your files within days. Your people test it, I fix what they find, and the finished pilot lands inside two to three weeks, shown and written down.
Build anything that sends, files or signs on its own. It drafts and flags. A person decides.
Agree to build something I can't build. You'll hear that on the call, not three weeks in.
Give legal advice. I'm not a lawyer, and what I build does not practise law.
Claim a security certification I don't hold. You get the list of tools instead, in writing, before you sign.
Your call, written into the scope. Either a permissioned folder shared with me alone, or processing kept local. I'll tell you exactly which tools touch your content, and you can approve or veto any of them before anything runs.
It drafts, it doesn't act, so an error costs a review. You see it on real matters in two to three weeks, early enough to stop.
You do, on final payment. Your accounts, your keys, documented so another developer could pick it up.
It runs on software you already pay for. There's no licence of mine to lapse, and the documentation goes with it.
After the call: a workflow, a fixed price and a date, or a straight no.